Cancer Experiences Collaborative (CECo) Logo - Click here to return to the home page
 
Innovative Approaches to Complex Symptoms
Methodology
Older Adults and Supportive and Palliative Care
Research Partners
Research Capacity
On-line Exchange
Other months:
Information about CECo CECo General Calendar Document resources Other CECo Services
About CECo
CECo Collaborators
Member Profiles
CECo Events
Next event:

19th October 2010
2nd National End of Life Care Conference
(External event)
Document resources
Links of interest
Contact us
CECo Funding
CECo Publications
CECo News <<<<<< For CECo-wide news, click the button to the left ... CECO Older People theme Funding opportunity, Invitation to Nominate - 2011-12 U.K. Harkness Fellowships in Health Care Policy and Practice (IV),
An introduction to CECo

Supporting lay carers in end of life care: current gaps and future priorities

Link to articleGrande G, Stajduhar K, Aoun S, Toye C, Funk L, Addington-Hall J, Payne S, Todd C
Palliative Medicine Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 339-344 (June 2009)

Abstract:
Informal carers are central to the achievement of end of life care and death at home and to policy aims of enabling patient choice towards end of life. They provide a substantial, yet hidden contribution to our economy. This entails considerable personal cost to carers, and it is recognised that their needs should be assessed and addressed. However, we lack good research evidence on how best to do this. The present position paper gives an overview of the current state of carer research, its gaps and weaknesses, and outlines future priorities. It draws on a comprehensive review of the carer literature and a consensus meeting by experts in the field. Carers’ needs and adverse effects of caregiving have been extensively researched. In contrast, we lack both empirical longitudinal research and conceptual models to establish how adverse effects may be prevented through appropriate support. A reactive, "repair" approach predominates. Evaluations of existing interventions provide limited information, due to limited rigour in design and the wide variety in types of intervention evaluated. Further research is required into the particular challenges that the dual role of carers as both clients and providers pose for intervention design, suggesting a need for future emphasis on positive aspects of caregiving and empowerment. We require more longitudinal research and user involvement to aid development of interventions and more experimental and quasi-experimental research to evaluate them, with better utilisation of the natural experiments afforded by intra- and international differences in service provision.

Key Words:
family carers • review • research methods • palliative care

URL to article:
http://pmj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/23/4/339

  Back to top